Most people reading this blog are not familiar with who Tom Kacich is. No, he’s not related to Republican presidential candidate John Kasich (last names are pronounced identically, but are spelled differently). He’s a political pundit for The News-Gazette, a Champaign, Illinois-based newspaper.
In his thoughts about the aftermath of the Iowa Democratic Caucuses (picture right), Kacich said two things that completely defy any kind of logic that isn’t of the political pundit class in this country.
First, Kacich said that, after an expected loss in the New Hampshire Primary to Bernie Sanders, Hillary’s campaign “should be rescued by a number of primaries and caucuses in more friendly states, including Alabama, Arkansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, and South Carolina. While a few of those states, such as Alabama, Arkansas, and South Carolina (all Deep South states) should be some of Hillary’s strongest areas, the other three are not solidly for Hillary. While Hillary still has a sizable lead in Nevada, it wouldn’t be out of the question for Bernie to pull off a win there, especially given Hillary’s “abuela” blunder late last year. Regarding Minnesota and Massachusetts, those states are not strongly favorable for Hillary at all. Minnesota should favor Bernie to some degree, especially if he were to run up a huge margin in the Iron Range region of the state and not get blown out of the water in the Minneapolis/St. Paul region. Massachusetts should favor Bernie, especially since Western Massachusetts is politically similar to Bernie’s home state of Vermont.
Second, Kacich said that, if Hillary’s campaign begins to tank in a significant way, a movement to draft Joe Biden into the presidential race could commence. There are several major problems with that claim. First, Biden has already said that he’s not running. Second, the only way that Biden could enter the presidential race now is through a convention challenge, and I’m not sure if Democratic National Committee (DNC) rules even allow for that. Third, it is extremely unlikely that no candidate will get an outright majority of delegates on the first convention ballot. In the unlikely instance that neither Hillary nor Bernie secure a majority of delegates, it will probably play out in a manner similar to the 1980 Democratic National Convention, where Ted Kennedy requested a free vote of delegates, despite the fact that Jimmy Carter had a majority of pledged delegates. The free vote was denied, and Carter won the nomination.
The fact that Tom Kacich can’t even mention Bernie Sanders by name, and is an absolutely awful pundit, shows how awful The News-Gazette is. No wonder why they’re giving out two-week free trials to people in East Central Illinois…